canon 135mm f2 astrophotography10 marca 2023
The shot of the cat could certainly be improved through cropping, though. The best of them, Nikon's 70-200E, is just as sharp all but the very best primes - ie, already too sharp for most portrait work. These lenses go about as close as you could get without a dedicated macro lens. EF-mount only, this packs more megapixels, a bigger sensor, and a high max ISO. If You can afford it, buy it! Bye best lens, blur, sharp-super, no CA, minimal shading. Focusing a wide open F/2 lens is demanding of the optics, especially on a field of stars in the night sky. A coupe of stage shows, one very recent, and a random collection using this lens exclusively Rokinon FE14M-C Lens. Would you recommend a collar/support for the lens? Barney and Chris have been shooting the new Sony 50mm F1.4 GM, and we have a bunch of full resolution samples for you to peruse. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. Thanks & Cheers I used Canon's 135 f/2 for ten years. Adam007,"a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels"No thanks. Could use a few updates. Your first serious portrait lens should be a modern stabilized 70-200 f/2.8. I got my first 400 around 50 years ago, and I must say that each step forward feels like a revolution, for a while. I guess thats where practice will come in handy. A Bargain, very competively priced I used this lens quite a bit years ago as my main working lens. (purchased for $800), reviewed March 15th, 2010 Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. never mind.. confirmed from others that F19 is indeed the one that is excluded on this lens! Yet the Jaegers becomes essentially color free when stopped down to 3in. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. See the full-size version on Astrobin. 1. This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. The logic of this article can be applied to a 200/2.8 as well. Add To Cart. The Precious - sharp images, fast focus, perfect weight, reference-quality build. For portraits and with a high MP body I'd be more inclined than ever to just go 85mm, and for other uses it's hard to pass up the zooms' versatility, but I still there's still room for 135s in some kits and some formats. CANON LENS FOR ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. The Canon is about as sharp as the Samyang, but it has some very slight chromatic aberration. Diffraction from the cheap EF-s kit zoom lens was uneven. Hi Trevor, modest cost for "L" series, wonderful optics and fast speed, nitpicking, but not a circular aperature and no weather sealing. I have just acquired my astrophotography set up thanks to all your videos and doing some research. Orion nebula shot with Canon T3i and Rokinon 135mm @ F2.0 150 shots with dark bias and flats stacked and edited. Seems to me that Michael is pretty new to using long telephoto lenses, he writes that the Samyang is the first he has owned. Photos posted are pleasing but I'd be into seeing something new. That whole rig comes to about $1200, minus the mount. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. I think the readers would welcome contributions from other members' experiences. Some of the primes have a special look to them, but only the 70-200 is indispensable. The Samyang 135mm F/2 easily lives up to its hype and should be near the top of your list of purchases if you are new or experienced in the field of astrophotography. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop using the aperture ring at the base of the lens. Also, I used to have a Nikon 180/2.8 ED IF AF and 300/4 ED IF AF. I would never shell out hundreds of euros for a 135 prime let alone one with manual focus. My first photo of the night sky is of Comet NEOWISE, however I know its not the best photo I could capture. Sometimes though, we stumble upon a great lens design which is strong in all three. People mistake "Bokeh" to blurry background, what is very very common mistake. For DPReview, it's also an opportunity for a good old-fashioned camera fight. Yeah I agree that the sentiment that they were designed to be used stopped down is wrong as they were designed to be used wide open because they had to be for speed (my point above). I have the Sony SaL 135F1.8 Zeiss Lens and think that is excellent. Bottom line, this is just an outstanding lens by any measure, one that makes clear why you'd want to pay the freight for expensive prime glass. At the other end of the aperture range though, the 5D's larger pixels actually help matters, as the softening starts later (it's very sharp even at f/16), and is noticeably lower at f/32. It is the lens I use as a reference point to compare all new lens acquisitions to after purchase to determine if they need to be returned for repair or replacement. Lens hood - when I bought this lens years ago the included hood was rather cheap (perhaps Canon has updated the hood) by comparison with other hoods. Otherwise this lens is absolutely incredible. Love the shot of the blue anemone, which also displays nice bokeh, and blur! The presentation and hands-on look and feel of the 135mm F/2 lens is impressive considering the reasonable price of this lens. Great lens, but I can't understand why Canon can't control quality. +1 for the 135mm lens. It would seem to be a better use of a camera to first look for a suitable background, and then and only then to use bokeh. They were not however designed to be bokeh monsters though that was just a side effect of making them fast and people bought them for speed with bokeh being the afterthought so not Bokeh for the sake of Bokeh as he said. How about the sigma 50mm f1.4 Art? When I was on my way home after purchasing my first 135mm lens (the Samyang/Rokinon one) I took a few quick snapshots just to try out the lens. With the 135 I imagine I'd have to get up on the roof. Since i am totally new in this field, i would like to start with astrophotography but using my existing camera (Fuji XT-30). If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. It's an ideal portrait lens. While they provide a very large flat field we noticed some CA. Do I wish it were manufactured with metal? Everyone should have one? It seems they are now quite comparable in quality to prime lenses. As soon as e.g. I put quotes around the ones that are written on the lens. This is great news if you like to photograph small things up close. My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! My tests on it are described on http://pikespeakphoto.com/tests/canonlens135.html, i have never been a prime lens fan, just seems to leave you feeling trapped in a single dimension. Finally, to prevent image shift during exposure, all telephoto lenses must be supported at two points: at the camera end, and at the far end with a large retaining ring. The Rokinon website lists this lens as being useful for portraiture photography, and most telephoto applications. And if you want autofocus, I would recommend the Canon 135mm f2.0L, which is incredibly light for its performance at just 750g. Samyang 135 f/2 astrophotography gallery Below some pictures I made using Samyang 135 lens with QHY163 mono camera and iOptron Smart EQ Pro mount. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. After the first exposure in M mode, the camera throws an error saying Error please press the shutter button again. In this new review, I focus exclusively on the unprecedented Samyang 135mm f/2, which is primarily designed for portrait and wildlife. Prime lenses are typically lighter as they do not need the additional glass and mechanics required to zoom at varying magnifications. But in the rush to make hybrids why are aren't we giving video shooters the tools they need? We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. Perhaps it's not a big thing, but for a L-graded lens this feature should be expected. For my purposes, this is a spectacular lens. Some people may disagree with the vignetting being a good thing or not, but thats a matter of taste I guess. If you're using or are looking to buy the Samyang or Rokinon 135mm F/2, please let me know what you're imaging with it or any questions you may have in the comment section below. You won't get the excessive background blurr -- which for the beginning photographer may actually be a good thing. You might never need another lens in the overlapping range at 135mm there isn't much difference between the separation afforded by f/2 vs f/2.8, and the latest 70-200s are plenty sharp. Another lens to consider at this focal length (at maximum zoom) is the Rokinon 135mm F/2. The next 200mm lens of excellent quality is the 200mm F4 Nikkor F which requires the Nikon F to EOS adapter. (And cost less too). http://www.idyll.com/laneysat Agreed. Yes there's bokeh. I also find the other photos not very good. Pentax seems to have put more emphasis than others on keeping the resolution uniform all over the field. The Rho Ophiuchi Cloud Complex by Eric Cauble using the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens. The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens makes an excellent indoor sports lens. You will see why. Not rude at all, a fair comment. (purchased for $900), reviewed April 15th, 2011 Some people like these, and consider them decorative. If you have a more appropriate portrait lens like an 85, 90 or 100, the 135 does not bring you very much. Often need f2.2 to f2.8 to gain sufficient DOF for human subjects. If you are a Nikon user, of course have a look at the Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC and compare it to the other lenses mentioned in this article. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. Please ride off on the same horse you rode in on. To shoot indoors under typical gymnasium lighting, you often need f/2.0 or wider to get a shutter speed high enough to stop the action. Wonderful, smooth bokeh. Then you should have tried the 180mm nikkor ED, the old one, which is the favorite tool of a lot of astrophotographers. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. Not only does it let you travel light, but impressive wide field projects are often more successful when captured under a dark sky. If you want autofocus and great value for money, buy the Canon 135mm, as it has almost the image quality of the Samyang, and you can get it for under $1,000 new. The Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 was the first lens I had ever used like this, and these aspects do not hinder the astrophotography experience whatsoever. I am still very proud of some of the photos I shoot with a Pentax O450 15 years ago - a good smartphone camera today is at least as capable. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej Off topic, There have been a lot of Tele-Tessars over the years. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. Amazing colours, contrast, bokeh, everything! Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. One of my very best lenses! Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. The rest are relatively uncreative, and just seem lame to me. Focus throw. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. They just wanted to increase their joy from photography. As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. No telephoto lens can be used with cameras modified by the removal of the internal UV/IR cut filter and anti-aliasing filter. Meanwhile the ol' Canon 135/2 is still commanding a higher than average price on the used market (70%+ of MSRP isn't common), I guess the low weight and super easy resale have almost made it a high end commodity. Not too heavy. Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. The shallow depth of field present at its maximum aperture does indeed create a pleasing bokeh. I do not like this. Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. The Japanese word "bokeh" can be translated into English as "blur". I was expecting a lot more of an article that says "the best telephoto lenses for astrophotography". I bought this lens after reading your great review for my Nikon D5300. Here is a short list of great astrophotography targets to shoot at 135mm with this lens: Below, is an incredible example of the types of projects possible with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 lens. The image below was captured using a DSLR and 135mm lens on the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer mount. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. Proper composition, light and retouching are much prefferable to crazy gooey bokeh. With the high megapixel cameras, most people are going to ideally want to shoot at 1/200 or faster. Today I want to talk about another such lens design: The 135mm F2 lens. Photography is full of fuzzy concepts. Preaching to the choir! Aperture ring. Focal length: 135mm Maximum aperture: f/2.0 Lens construction: 10 elements in 8 groups Angle of view: 18 degrees Closest focusing distance: 3 feet Focus adjustment: Rear focusing system with USM Mount: Canon Filter size: 72mm Dimensions: 3.2 inches in diameter and 4.4 inches long Weight: 1.7 pounds Warranty: 1 year See more If you can tolerate vignetting, there are many normal 35mm lenses that are great wide open. The APO showed no chromatic aberration at all with the addition of the Astronomik UV/IR cut clip filter (passing 380-680nm), but the telephoto lenses, even when stopped down, showed a tight bright red ring around all stars. Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine. Trully sharp accross whole frame from f2 on 5d. You will never be able to beat this lense, believe me, i have tried them all. Oh and it's stabilised. Star parties or dark sky excursions are another great time to use a camera lens in place of the telescope. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. Sure, if you scroll through his page there are quite a few lens tests on starshttps://www.flickr.chotos/ytoropin/, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, Article: The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography, This is not recommended for shared computers, Review of Explore Scientific First Light 8, COUNTING SUNSPOTS WITH A $10 OPTICAL TUBE ASSEMBLY, Hubble Optics 14 inch Dobsonian - Part 2: The SiTech GoTo system, iStar Opticals Phantom FCL 140-6.5 review. The lens is so crisp that the diaphragm blade pattern is visible on point light sources shot at large aperature. OK guysTOS rule number one "Posts that are not respectful of other individuals (be they members or not) are not welcome here.". Overall, the lens feels very solid and well constructed. http://www.astrovale-f-2/index.html, Hi Lord_Vader, Will I be able to capture the heart nebula with the lens youre talking about or would I need to modify my camera as well? First of all, the background separation and the bokeh: I had photographed lots of animals in bushes before, but never before had I seen the bush melt away in the way it did with the 135mm lens. And they like circles (no ellipses or polygons) and smooth colour (no hard edges, no onion rings). Exposure uniformity (vignetting) is also really excellent, reaching a maximum of 1/4 EV (on a camera with an APS-C size sensor) at f/2, and dropping to well under 1/10 EV at f/2.8 and above. This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. She doesn't look like she is there. I love the lens for my modified Sony a6000! The following image was captured by Eric Cauble using the Samyang branded version of this lens. I purchased this lens for the purposes of wide-field deep-sky astrophotography from my light-polluted backyard (shown below), and when traveling to a dark sky site. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. Used on a crop body the results are still splendid but you gain on DOF, making it a great combination for wedding/event and ambient/available light. This creates an effective focal length of roughly 200mm, a useful magnification for a wide variety of astro-imaging scenarios. A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. Amazing for portraits, easily fast enough for indoor sports. I therefore reduce the aperture at the front end of the lens (as an aperture stop) by screwing in a series of step-down rings into the filter thread. This criticism refers to rare cases when your main subject matter is flat and completely inside the limited DOF range while the rest of the image is outside. fast, sharp wide open, excellent bokeh, value for money, very fast, sharp, gorgeous background blur, world class lens. I own a 135 since the film days (because you "had to have one" and could not afford much else), still have the zeiss Jena f3.5 M42 and even jumped for the zeiss f2.8 for my yashica when they were sold for next to nothing. Did anybody use this lens for DSLR astrophoto? Colour and contrast is great. It's just "girl" in front of blurriness.#2: Plants on a pond.It's okay. Fast focus, Super sharp, Well built, Awesome for low light. There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. By far the best one is the Tiffen Haze 2 filter. Its a joy to work with every time. By the way, I still enjoy using my very sharp Sears 135mm, PKA mount lens. sigh, overdone bokeh and centre sharpness bear little relevance to the art of this hobby. I found with the 70-200 made me lazy. The only reason i sell this lens is because of versatility. Stuff I used to take the photos in this video:- The Canon 135mm f2 lens: https://amzn.to/346Paz7- Sony A7III Camera: https://amzn.to/2xM776q- Sony Grip exten. But you couldn't have because you don't know even as much as this guy. I had a 70-200 f/4 that i used unstopped at 200 with awesome results. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. Asahi Optical's Pentax KX was one of the first cameras with this lens mount, acting as a midrange model in the lineup. Ironically all the sample images in this post are painfully soft. Perhaps this impression of unreal sharpness is strengthened by the contrast to the extremely creamy bokeh you typically get in the same photo. The OP admits he limited experience with lenses other than what he has. I'm thinking a modern (but expensive) Nikon 200mm f/2.0, 300mm f/4 or f/2.8 or a Borg telephoto/telescope would all be very good. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. While some people LOVE the bokeh circles (first photo), others hate them and consider them a distraction.The 50mm f/1.8 is hardly a lens to talk about. In the middle of the OM System lineup, the OM-5 promises yesterday's top-tier performance in a lighter, more compact body. It improves slightly stopped down. f1.4 was a necessisty rather than a creative luxury. We think it rises to the challenge. He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. It is a parade of photos that should have been galled out after a boring Sunday afternoon shoot of "Think I'll bring along a camera when I walk the dog", There are so many things wrong in this 'review' -- most of all the idea that 'you' should get this lens and somehow it magically makes the duck or the cat stuck right in the center of picture a great photo! OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price.
Blinking Light In Sky Not Moving,
How Long Does It Take For A Hamster To Decompose,
Cars With Factory Hidden Compartments,
5 Star Hotels In Toronto,
Tact Acronym Nhs,
Articles C