what the bleep do we know debunked10 marca 2023
what the bleep do we know debunked

Film / What the #$*! But it's not true for the universe at large. Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. A: Well, Roger Penrose has given lots of new-age crackpots ammunition by suggesting that at some fundamental scale, quantum mechanics might be relevant for consciousness. If he says hes being misrepresented, I quite believe him. Some lost their entire life savings. !" is a radical departure from convention. 1. 3. Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. [9] In his review, Dave Kehr of The New York Times described the "transition from quantum mechanics to cognitive therapy" as "plausible", but stated also that "the subsequent leapfrom cognitive therapy into large, hazy spiritual beliefsisn't as effectively executed. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. Has this experiment been replicated or verified? logged you out. John Haglin Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. We may be able to use quantum communication in ways that we haven't done before. What the Bleep Do We Know!? The director, William Arntz, has described What the Bleep as a film for the "metaphysical left". you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' It's certainly not. What the #$*! Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. It was really hard to sit through. Last night I went to see a movie which was advertised as being about quantum physics, called What the Bleep Do We Know?. The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. Occasionally recalling a physics lesson, an acid trip, and a lost afternoon at a New Age bookstore, What The BLEEP Do We Know?! The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream. It's used as an excuse to be even weirder. I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. The question "What the bleep do we know?" has an unambiguous answer: both surprisingly much and amazingly little. Dr Candice Pert ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. Where were we now? The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". So does classical physics. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. He also invested over $10,000.00 in an infamous scam that infected RSE and was touted by Ramtha as a vehicle to gain fabulous wealth and many of the schools membership lost substantial sums of money. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. You should be wary whenever you hear something like, "Quantum mechanics connects you with the universe" or "quantum mechanics unifies you with everything else." And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. or call us at 1-617-450-2300. contact customer service From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. Wow, indeed! That's its claim anyway. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. (Source: iStockphoto). It's there. http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565, http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. - Dr. Viewers instead are fed a nauseating stream of nonsense that traces back to the teaching of a woman who claims to channel a 35,000-year-old deity. If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. There's nothing wrong with that. We do, at subatomic scale, behave quantum mechanically. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? But how are ordinary mortals to judge its assertions about the nature of matter, mind, and the universe? Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. This website uses cookies to We Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). " " " !". In reality, science is completely incidental to the film's conclusions. But she is right about us not seeing things in front of our eyes if we're not looking for them. One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. We hear more and more from JZ Knight, a woman channeling the ancient warrior Ramtha, a chap who (through Knight) incidentally leads the Ramtha School of Enlightenment. Quantum mechanics is crazy, but it's just crazy enough to make the world still be sensible at a macroscopic level, the level that we experience. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. That's not the case. yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? 4. Only the Shaman knows, and we're about 500 years too late to ask him. We might be able to create quantum computers, for example, that will simultaneously do many different calculations at once, because the quantum world is capable of doing many things at the same time. We're always being told we don't use our brain to its full capacity. On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. 1. Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. is released on Friday. . For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Knight's compound outside the town of Yelm has been built over the former horse-breeding grounds: The estate consists of JZ's present home, a white 12,800 square foot French chateau styled 4-bedroom house, her original home (a 1,600 sq. But quantum mechanics, for better or worse, doesn't bring any more spiritual benefits than gravity does. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. You can begin to be skeptical that the speaker is somehow trying to use quantum mechanics to argue fundamentally that you can change the world by thinking about it. 4000 volunteers regularly meditated to achieve a 25% drop in violent crime by the end of summer. You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). [12], Richard Dawkins stated that "the authors seem undecided whether their theme is quantum theory or consciousness. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres 7. 2. does a reasonable job of presenting some of these quandaries, researchers say. We don't know which way it's going to go. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. Andrew B Newberg, (MD, Radiologist), in What the Bleep Do We Know? ", "What the Bleep Do We Know!? (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? The 2004 theatrical release was succeeded by a substantially changed, extended home media version in 2006. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. Though not marketed as such, those who have seen it note that it degenerates into an extended infomercial for channeler J. Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? It's certainly not. And a lot of people talk about quantum consciousness that even if the everyday world we see is not a system that can be changed, our consciousness about the world can be changed. D (k)ow!? The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. But quantum-mechanical computers might be able to, and then of course we'd have to start thinking about how to make things more secure. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. A: Absolutely. Having watched this travesty of a movie, any real scientist worth his quarks might be gun-shy about joining the debate. John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. With researchers and theoretical scientists leading the way, it takes the reader through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear. Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? That sounds like magic. "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf and published a study guide. Suddenly people who were talking about subatomic particles are alluding to alternate universes and cosmic forces, all of which can be harnessed in the interest of making Ms. Matlin's character feel better about her thighs. [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. What could be worse than being aware of every tiny detail that your brain handles from phosphate levels to heart rate and hair growth. The film was also discussed in a letter published in Physics Today that challenges how physics is taught, saying teaching fails to "expose the mysteries physics has encountered [and] reveal the limits of our understanding". As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. unless you renew or William Arntz has referred to the film as "WTFDWK" in a message to the film's street team. Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. Certainly, our attitudes and brain chemistry affect how we see the world and get through life. Often, people who are trying to sell whatever it is they're trying to sell try to justify it on the basis of science. About. The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense." Well, people are able to undergo various transformations. Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. A: Of course it does. That matter is not solid, and electrons are able to pop in and out of existence without it being known where they disappear to. Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. That would be, very hard to quantify:). Never mind that the movie didnt even have a plot. One other area where quantum mechanics works on a macroscopic scale is in superconductivity and superfluidity. Consciousness must be involved. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\09 What the Bleep.wav Peak level 100.0 % Extraction speed 8.6 X Track quality 100.0 % Test CRC 2A67087E Copy CRC 2A67087E Accurately ripped (confidence 4) [55AC2A89] (AR v1) Copy OK Track 10 Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\10 Circle the Sun.wav Peak level 100.0 % Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? Whether or not you buy into its "you are God in the making" philosophy, "What the Bleep Do We Know?" And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." Answer: Photographer. It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman. Amit Gotswami I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. They want suggestions, not formulas. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? Even so it notched up $10m in. I guess the difference between me and those other people is that I actually have some grasp on the concepts that the movie was trying to talk about. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. Neither of them convincingly achieve this. But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? Tags: science-and-technology, neuroscience, physics. This message will appear once per week If we don't understand classical consciousness, how can we understand quantum consciousness? While the (probabilistic) predictions of quantum mechanics are, as far . Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. The observer can't be ignored." But we're certainly using them at the Large Hadron Collider, which we couldn't even operate if we didn't have superconducting magnets. Your subscription to 8. Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? is god-awful. 3. "Physical reality is absolutely rock solid, yet it only comes into existence when it bumps up against another piece of physical reality like us, or a rock." You are free to comment as you wish. continue to use the site without a And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. Producing, scripting, and co-directing the film, What the BLEEP went on to become a global phenomenon, with well over 100 million viewers experiencing the BLEEP. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot.

Kingsborough Community College Spring 2022 Calendar, Arthur Lyman Lawyer, Map Azure Blob Storage As Network Drive, Andrea By Sadek Made In Thailand, Articles W