358 norma magnum vs 35 whelen10 marca 2023
Choose at least medium weight for caliber: 140 grains in 6.5mm and the lighter 7mms; 140 and 150 grains in .270s; 150 to 160 grains in faster 7mms; 165 or 180 grains in .30 calibers. pushes a 200-grain bullet to just more than 2000 f.p.s. In 1987 Remington made an honest cartridge out of the .35 Whelen. Whelen would not. Ruger briefly chambered the M77 rifle in .35 Whelen. The .358 in a bolt-action rifle with a good scope is as accurate as any hunting cartridge available. Now, I have to go out on a limb and say that sensible elk cartridges aren't all about power. But there is no compelling reason to consider a caliber larger than .35. In more recent times, the 1994 release of the .450 Rigby gave dangerous game hunters a bit more bullet weight than the .416 Rigby and has developed a small but devout following among both professional hunters and their clients alike. The .35's are just plain superior for CXP3 class game. Where does the .358 Norma sit, in comparison to the more popular cartridges in its class? Back in the late 70's I picked up a custom 1903 in 358 Norma Mag, awesome rifle, very accurate and it put a thump on deer, I bought it hopping to get a moose tag back in MN, never did and sold the rifle. Particularly when you consider that every one of those newer short magnum cartridges burns more powder to achieve less killing power than the .350 Rem. That 225-grain bullet has a sectional density (SD) value of 0.251, a bit light for what is normally considered to be appropriate for dangerous game. If we compare the .300 Win. I have one, and I like it a lot. Thinking of a medium bore with a bit of thump.9.3 x 62 holds some exotic mystique for me being its use on African large game but I am thinking realistically .366 cant be that much of an advantage over .358 can it? What should the discerning collector look for in a potential buy? It was recovered in bits and pieces. This is a particularly apt comparison because the re-introduced .350 is available in the Remington Model Seven rifle, which is also offered in .300 short magnum calibers. Bottles & 12-oz. Its said that the French used it in World War I, but it probably didnt see much action. We've got you covered. .22 LR7mm-08 Remington8mm Remington Magnum.338 Federal.224 Valkyrie.338-06 A-Square9.3x62mm Mauser.257 Weatherby Magnum.45-70 Government.300 H&H Magnum.25-06 Remington.30-06 Springfield6.5 Creedmoor.300 Remington Ultra Magnum7mm Remington Magnum.470 Nitro Express.280 Remington.300 Winchester Magnum.270 Winchester.222 Remington.45 ACP.404 Jeffery.44 Remington Magnum.41 Remington Magnum.243 Winchester.338 Winchester Magnum.357 S&W Magnum6.5-284 Norma8x57 Mauser.38 Smith & Wesson Special7x57mm Mauser9 mm Luger.35 Whelen.454 Casull.375 H&H Magnum.45 Colt.22-250 Remington10mm Auto.308 Winchester. Its safe to say that of all the .358 Norma Magnum rifles in existence, there are more custom than factory ones, and this makes it tricky to load for in another way. Most were intended for .38-caliber handguns, but any bullet made for either the .38 Special or .357 Magnum can be loaded and shot in the .358 Norma Magnum with varying degrees of success. You can never lead if you always follow; the other cartridges were designed to chase Winchesters success, while the .35 Rem. Compare the .308 Winchester and the .358 Winchester, which are based on the same case, and the .358 wins hands down. In an age of ultra-specializatio in every field, and especially rifles, such versatility is almost an anachronism. .358 Norma brass is a snap to make from 338 Win Mag brass. Let's also compare the .358 with the other end of the spectrum. Equal in importance is that you can hit the elk. In the 80s, when Jack Carter was making his Trophy Bonded Bearclaw bullet by hand, I did some elk hunting with the 240-grain .375 version. of muzzle energy. can drive the same weight bullet a bit faster. Many western hunters annually take elk with 6mms and .25s. But in my experience, if you can cover that 300-yard window with confidence youre in good shape. Here are the features to watch out for. There are specialized situations where close shots are the norm, but most often, the ideal elk rifle should have enough versatility for shots out to 300 yards and change. During the spring conservation order, you can hunt with outfitters from Arkansas to Saskatchewan. The numerous magnum .30s are also excellent, but they deliver more recoil. Movement is more random in big country. The big case certainly made its reputation with the 250-grain bullets, as their sectional density gives excellent penetration on even the heavy-boned animals, and the .358 Norma can push them to a muzzle velocity of 2750 fps. Here the elk offers hunters an advantage because the vital zone, like body size, is at least twice that of any deer. They truly were ahead of their time, as they were short magnums back when being a short magnum wasnt cool. in a rimmed cartridge that would work in a lever-action rifle. Energy figures have it knocking at the door of 375H&H. Fusion Ammo has a 200-grain with a muzzle velocity of 2800 f.p.s. The norma would cost more if I had to open the bolt face. Frankly, I would not want to be without them. Copyright 2000-2023 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved. That year, Remington also brought out the Model 673 Guide Gun in .350 Rem Mag. These include some of my favorites, such as the .358 Winchester and .45-70. Why cant we love the .35? Theres more to success than merely landing a good one on the chin. Bertram Brass from Australia is a good source when you can get it, and Quality Cartridge makes a run of .350 Rigby every few years, but you could be waiting a considerable amount of time. I wont go so far as to say thats foolish, but theres a major difference in size and toughness between a cow or spike and a mature bull. Back in 1983 Winchester introduced the .356 Win. The .300 Rem. The long accepted story was that James V. Howe developed the cartridge in 1922 and named it in honor of his friend, gunwriter Col. Townsend Whelen. Here in North America big game starts with deer. In both cartridges, versatility is limited more by the narrow range of bullets available than by any other factor. In the mid 70's I picked up a 358Norma. was designed for the American market, but sadly no American riflemaker ever chambered the cartridge in a cataloged gun. In the shooting sports we call that reaction recoil or "kick." The .356 Win. With the 250-grain bullet, it's better than the .30-06 on heavy game at close ranges. Everybody agrees that the .358 Win. Got a nice .270 Win MTN Rifle donor 700. 200-grain bullet to almost 2500 f.p.s. Most Professional Hunters agree that a bullet with a S.D. The .35 Rem. Any listing you find for H-4895 can be modified by loading only 60 percent of the published minimum to create some very comfortable loads. For the handloader, as the accompanying table demonstrates, the .358 Norma Magnum provides an almost unbelievable range of possibilities, from loads light enough for gallery shooting to heavy enough. These were, primarily, the Schultz & Larsen (Denmark), the Husqvarna (Sweden) and a few Browning High Powers made by FN in Belgium. Maybe I'll just get a 375 H+H instead of going the Norma route. [1] At the same time, it will do almost everything the .375 will but with vastly more versatility. Wolfe Publishing Company | 2180 Gulfstream Suite A | Prescott, AZ 86301. They include both the AccuBond and the Partition 225-grain bullets with a muzzle velocity of 2800 f.p.s. Any of these will handle just about any big game one might hunt with a .358 Norma, where you want to employ its ample knockdown power. Essentially the .338 Winchester Magnum necked up to hold .358-inch bullets, the .358 Norma Magnum made all sorts of sense to a hunter in pursuit of large game, such as elk, moose and the great bears of the north. The .35 Whelen is a necked up medium bore wildcat cartridge that was created by necking up a .30-06 Springfield case which is famously overpowered for the 30-caliber bullet it propels. The full spectrum of our many 7mms, from 7mm-08 and 7x57 on up to the fastest 7mm magnums, are also fine, but they are not magical giant-slayers. Powders such as IMRs Trail Boss, Accurates 5744 and IMRs discontinued SR-4759 all work with lighter bullets, and sometimes accuracy is very good, even if the gas seal is not. The .35-caliber cartridges usually top out at 250 grains, though if a 300-grain bullet at a slightly faster twist rate were employed, it would certainly be in the same class as the .375 Holland & Holland. compare 338/06 vs 338 win, and 35 whelen vs 358 norma vs 358 alaskan (stw) loaded to same pressure. Among my own favorites for the .358 Norma are the Nosler Partitions in both 225 and 250 grains, Swift A-Frames (225, 250, 280) and various Woodleighs, including the unique 310-grain Weldcore. In any mass-production rifle, either the .375 or .338, or both, will be found as a standard chambering. Avoid quick-opening bullets, especially match bullets; instead, choose controlled-expansion designs intended for hunting larger game. Today, rifles can be made very light, but that can also be overdone because light rifles are whippy and hard to control when youre out of breath and have to settle in for a quick shot. Still have a 9.3 (so I guess it "won"). I have long been something of a .35 caliber fan, but I have to admit that I believe the reason for the general lack of public acceptance of all but the least powerful .35's is, in a word, recoil. Sure, we experiment a bit with other bore sizes, but in the end it always comes back to the .30 caliber. The .358 Norma Mag. Moderate, safe, bland and predictable. Your at the old delema again: does 200 fps matter to the deer. All we do know for sure is that it was either Howe or Whelen, or both, who necked the .30-06 Sprg. As a comparison, the .358 Winchester with a 250 grain bullet at 2300 fps delivers 25.4 foot-pounds of recoil from a 7.5 pound rifle. I have become a 35 cal. I'd go with the 35 whelen. and a 250-grain Partition load with a muzzle velocity of 2550 f.p.s. With such a wide range of both cast and jacketed bullets available, and todays variety in powders, the .358 Norma has an embarrassment of riches when it comes to load possibilities. You bet they worked! And with modern powders and loads, it knocks on the door of the .300 WSM and .300 Winchester Magnum. Equal in importance is that you can hit the elk. I have one, of course, and it is fun to shoot, but I would never use it on a serious big-game hunt. The Whelen is a more sensible choice, but the Rigby isnt about sensibility, its about nostalgia and a connection to a bygone age. Kevin Steele of Petersen's HUNTING is at the Streamlight booth at SHOT Show 2023 to go over the Bear Trap light from Streamlight. Recoil was completely manageable, and it inspired me to begin the journey of having my own .350 Rigby rifle built. So when it comes to penetrating thick hide and heavy bone, one could see where the .350 Rigby could benefit from a heavier bullet, say a premium 250-grain with a SD of .279. it is one nice gun and made for tight places. Quite a difference! 35 Whelen. The cartridge predates the more famous .416 by three years, and the .350 Rigby was the first to feature the sharp 45-degree shoulder which is the hallmark of the Rigby designs. To reach the .300 mark, youd need a 270-grain bullet (the North Fork and Woodleigh bullets come immediately to mind), but stabilization becomes an issue in the slower twists, and thats long been a problem in .35-caliber barrels. But have owned multiple 9.3s and Whelens. A monster buck is different from a fork-horn or a fat doe. Im voting no. You can start with the 6.5mms. The softpoints were used for the various antelope species, dangerous cats and even buffalo, while the full-patch, non-expanding solids would be used on elephant. The Norma factory load, with Normas own 250-grain bullet, performed poorly, coming apart in the chest cavity. Another vote for something different.The 358 STA would be the one. Layne Simpson did an article on the comparison of the two and it was reprinted in Big Bore Rifles and Cartridge ISBN 1-879356-00-7. Faster 6.5sthe new 6.5 PRC, the old .264, or the super-fast .26 Nosler and 6.5-300 Weatherbywill deliver more energy and open the range envelope a bit. Like most of the children of the Holland & Holland parents, the .358 Norma uses its shoulder for headspacing, rather than the belt, as do the .375 and .300 H&H. The recent introduction of a Hornady LeverEvolution factory load for the .35 Remington has usefully improved its ballistics. The .35 Whelen has a relatively simple design: it's a .30-06 Springfield case necked up to use .358 instead of .308 bullets (the exact opposite of the .270 Winchester in other words). Of the bullets used, several performed extremely well, including the Bear Claw and a Nosler 250-grain Partition. 9.3x62 boots 320gr Woodleigh protected points and weldcore round noses out at 2400 fps with RL-17. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction; that is one of the physical laws of our universe. Common loads fire a 200-grain bullet at 2,800 fps (about 3,480 foot pounds of energy), a 225-grain bullet at around 2,600fps (3,380 foot pounds of energy . What keeps it alive? R Rocky Right now, I think that the Browning BLR lever-action rifle is the only production gun left on the market in .358 Win. The .357 Magnum revolver cartridge has also gained considerable popularity as a combination rifle/pistol cartridge and lever action rifles for the .357 Magnum sell pretty well. of muzzle energy. Between the .25s and the .35s are dozens of cartridges that are versatile and suitable. Although such weight is rare, a big bull can exceed 1,000 pounds. were to go head to head with the .25-35 Win., .30-30 Win. and is probably a better deer and black bear cartridge at woods ranges than the more popular .30-30 Win. Perhaps thats why it has survived. This is in sharp contrast to the overwhelming success of the .357/9mm handgun cartridges, whose popularity dates right to the beginning of the self-contained cartridge era. So, if you have an interest in carrying an ultra-rare cartridge of impeccable pedigree, you either roll your own or have someone load it for you.
Port Clinton News Herald Obituaries,
Adamson House Malibu Wedding Cost,
Peter Whittingham Death Pub,
Bone Resorption Vs Absorption,
How To Email A Caterer,
Articles OTHER